Thursday, June 9, 2011

Colony Collapse Disorder in bees - a new look

With all the press about Colony Collapse Disorder (where hives just disappear for no apparent reason) I find myself comparing this to what other "farm animals" face in the industrialized food system.  Yes, industrialized... It is surprising just how industrialized (i.e unnatural)  beekeeping has become. As with other farm animals, we had no idea how commercial unnatural, and industrial beekeeping has become.

I truly do not see any difference between CCD in bees and health issues rising in every commercial animal product industry related to health. I would offer a simplistic perspective (true answers are often simplistic once understood) :

"Science" is taking a wrong approach to understanding and solving the problem. Science is looking for the "cause" in the form of something that is now happening that wasn't happening before. Whether that be a new virus, bacteria, pesticide, it doesn't matter, the list is endless. The problem is that they are looking for a "cause". This is a extremely shortsighted and naive view of nature, but it is identical to the thinking that has brought down animal health and food nutrition over the last few decades. CCD is NOT caused by any single entity nor even collection of entities or conditions. Rather, the cause is in the system. Let me explain.

Anytime man has drifted away from nature's time tested principles and methods, negative issues have arisen. Anytime man has strived to "improve on production" or decrease cost in animal product production, negative side effects have occurred. This is evident in every animal industry you look at today (chickens, turkeys, eggs, pork, lamb, etc). Science in America (implemented largely through educational institutions) has strived to improve profit at all costs, and costs have been rising constantly.

To understand CCD in bees, lets do a comparison between nature and modern beekeeping:

1. Forced cell size - Common bee hives today include a "foundation" for the bees to build their honeycomb on. This foundation sets a definite size of the cells of the honeycomb. This is done to improve honey production by increasing the cell size. It works by providing about a 30% increase in honey per hive. The down side is that it is unnatural and damaging to the bees
  • The larger size limits the creation of "drone bees". these drones do not make honey so limiting them is seen as a good thing to increase honey production. However, the drones serve a vital purpose in nature of spreading the genetic of the hive amongst other hives. This spreading of genetics is similar to that of all animals and even people. If a family intermarried and created offspring, the genetic pool shrinks and the result is genetic defects coming through. This is exactly what happens in bees, as the drone population shrinks, genetics become less diverse, and all the hives in the region become genetically weak in any number of ways, including disease and parasite resistance.
  • The larger size cell takes longer for worker bees to cover once the queen lays an egg inside. That extra time (hours) allows more chance for mites to enter the cell with the egg / larva and cause damage. Therefore mites are much more of a problem, and can actually be devastating. This is often treated by beekeepers by using chemicals. (more in a later point)

2. Chemicals - Once problems arise from any source, the industrial method of treating those  problems is through use of unnatural chemicals. These chemicals all have side effects (as do medicines we take as humans, antibiotics in farm animal feed, etc) The chemical itself weakens the colony more and often can get impregnated into the honeycomb or wood of the hive for a lasting effect.


3. Re-use of honeycomb - it takes time for bees to produce honeycomb, this time is time that is not spent producing honey. Therefore to industrial beekeeping it is advantageous to re-use honeycomb by extracting the honey without damaging the comb, then reinsert the comb into the hive. Production improves. The side effect is that anything that got into the wax honeycomb ( a great attractor of everything) is left in the comb to weaken the bees for generations. This also has an accumulative effect, as if chemicals are use, every use adds to the chemical load already in the honeycomb.

4. Hive placement - Industrial beekeepers often place multiple hives in a location, not something the bees would do in nature. This makes it more efficient for the beekeeper (increased profits) but the problem is that if the hives are weakened by all the reasons above, and you locate multiple hives in a small area, you are increasing the chances of weak hives spreading genetics with other weak hives. chemical loads increase and become commonplace. Without wild bees to balance the genetics, the colonies slowly degrade over time.


5. Resistance - Another result of common chemical use is the issue of resistance. Just as we see in antibiotic use on animal feed, and pesticide / herbicide use in fields and gardens,  chemical use in bees breeds resistance in those things the chemicals are used for. this requires heavier and heavier doses to achieve the same affect. ( a primary difference between herbs and modern medicine.. another blog post). This effect, over time, increases the negative effects of all of the above.


6. Specific honey types -  Go to the store and you see all sorts of honey.. wildflower, clover, etc. But wait.. ask yourself how is this possible if bees naturally travel 5 to 10 miles from the hive to collect pollen? there are several approaches to this problem, but the point here is that all of these approaches fundamentally change the nature of the honey for the bees themselves. Think about this... bees make honey as their food source during the winter. The honey comb stored away for winter naturally contains honey created during all sorts of different "blooms" and thereby different color, flavor, and yes nutritional qualities. By removing the honey artificially during the year to produce different types for sale, the bees are left with only one type of honey at the end of the season (unless the beekeeper specifically manages this by leaving some honey of each type for bee consumption). This is the equivalent of making the bees over winter on one specific food instead of a variety of foods, limiting their nutritional intake for months compared to what nature intended.  Just as in animals and humans, limiting nutrition produces weakness and less resistance to disease.

 So you can see here a case building that points a finger at industrial bee production, and production increase methods as the cause of colony collapse disorder. If science find a single "cause" for CCD, even if that cause if removed, a new one will pop its head up soon thereafter and the cycle repeats. This is the process used by modern science, and is exactly the process used in the popular kids game.. Whack-A-Mole. Does this make sense? Why not instead realize that changing nature for the express purpose of increased profits IS in fact the cause of most of the evils and problems in the animal / farming industry. It is the changing of nature instead of working with nature that causes this.



As a case in point, bees kept in  natural hives (top bar / warez hives) and follow natural beekeeping principles do not seem prone to any of the problems affecting industrial bees (mites, ccd, etc).



Bottom line, CCD is not any different in my mind than the similar conditions affecting the industrial food system all over the world.  It is not a problem with bees, nor beekeeping, it is a problem with the industrial food system that is weakening animals, plants, and humans by increasing profits at all costs. One answer to all of these woes is small, local, sustainable farms working with nature instead of against nature. Find one today and buy your food from there to the greatest extent possible!





Wednesday, June 8, 2011

WE vs ME mentality

Brenda (my better half) ran across this in another blog and it fits perfectly so we wanted to share it here as well.

The link to the original blog is http://www.wellfedhomestead.com/2011/06/07/me-vs-we/

Here is the content:

=======================================================================

A friend recently explained to me the "me vs. we" mentality when it comes to buying our food. I have to admit, I’ve had a lot of the "me" mentality going on. Here’s the difference:



ME

I want what I want, when I want it


I want to get everything at the cheapest price I can


I don’t want to be inconvenienced


(this sums up the American way, doesn’t it?)



WE

I want to support my local farmers and keep them in business


I am willing to pay a higher price, because I know my local farmers aren’t relying on government subsidies to make an honest living


I am willing to pay a higher price, because I believe that it is just plain WRONG that most real-food farmers have to work a full time job and then work for good food "on the side"


I am willing to drive a few miles out of my way to get real, local food so that it does not have to be trucked into my local grocery store


I am willing to eat what is in season, knowing that produce that is not in season (yet in my grocery store) could not have been grown by my local farmers and had to be trucked in several (hundreds of) miles just so that I could enjoy it out of season.


(thinking about the community as a whole instead of SELF)


The end result of both mentalities:


ME
Food is grown hundreds of miles away from us and trucked to us just to give us what we want (spoiled little brats )


The government has to subsidize foods to make them cheaper for us


Farming–the profession that FEEDS US–is no longer a viable career option…most American farmers are over their heads and debt and have to work a full time job in order to pay for the farm. (Shame on us, Americans! Really…This is sad!!).


Because we don’t want to be inconvenienced, local farmers don’t get enough business coming to their berry stand or buying their raw milk or joining their CSA….And then another farm goes up for sale, because another farmer just couldn’t make it……(Side note: you don’t want to see farm lands be ripped up & Wal-Marts or other industrial buildings put in their place?? Support your local farmers!)…

WE

We improve the economy by keeping local farmers in business! (Lower those unemployment rates, starting in the rural areas!)


Government subsidies become a thing of the past


Farmers might be able to start FARMING as a full time job!


Less trucks are on the road delivering food hundreds of miles to me. I drive somewhere in my community to get my food.


Healthier bodies, eating food when it’s ripe/when God intended for us to eat it. Wet foods (nectarines, peaches, melons, tomatoes) in the summer when we need to be hydrated. Dryer foods (potatoes, squash, yams, brussels sprouts) in the winter when we need to stay warm….God had a perfect plan, and then we demand tomatoes in January and they don’t grow in our area in January…


WE could revolutionize the entire food system………..

Turkey roost roof on



We installed the roof panels on the turkey roost today. I chose tin for this one because of cost and strength.

It is almost ready for service! There are already a few improvements to make on the next one.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Baby Pigs Born!

We had a pleasant surprise today! After being gone all weekend at the Mother Earth News Fair, we got home to find a new litter of baby pigs! This was a small litter, only 4 were born, 1 of which didn't make it. The small size is because this is the first litter of our new breeder, who is offspring of our first breeder, and a little young. Younger pigs tend to have smaller litters. Normally the Red Wattle breed will have 10 to 15 piglets per litter. Nevertheless the 3 little ones seem to be healthy and doing fine with Mom!

Hunter and Kaelyn love baby pigs!

This little boar is hard to hold!

Would you like to touch it?

Well..... maybe just a little...

Can you see the little boar out on pasture with his Mom? He is hiding in the grass.

Mom keeps a close eye on this little guy!

Looks like he wants to explore the mud puddle! Will Mom let him in? Of course not, every time he tried she gently pushed him away with her snout.

But he is determined to get into trouble.

Mom keeps him right at her side when there is any sign of trouble, even just an anxious farmer trying to get closeup pictures.  These moms are so protective of their young it's just a joy to watch them interact.

First snake of the season



This big fellow is the first snake we have seen this season. He looks like food has not been a problem!

Anyone want to take a stab at an ID?